All Activity

Steve at Avantgarde A Mercedes specialist located in Clevedon, near Bristol, can assist you or provide guidance on the optimal course of action.

I have encountered extensive web literature indicating that this issue is prevalent across many Mercedes models; I reside in Bristol. I do not possess a warranty for the vehicle, unfortunately.

This issue has occurred in MB models; I recommend consulting an MB professional experienced in wiring and ECU cleaning. What is your location for a recommendation? Do you possess any warranty for the vehicle?

I have discovered that my cam sensors are leaking, possibly along with the magnets, and I am experiencing issues with the engine, particularly when cold, although it has begun to occur while warm as well, especially during acceleration from a standstill. The engine revs fluctuate erratically when the vehicle is barely in motion, indicating improper engagement during acceleration. This issue also occurs during reverse, although it improves as the engine reaches optimal temperature. Idling can be somewhat challenging as well. Upon observing the sensor leakage, I have linked the issue to the ECU, which has experienced infiltration. However, I have not yet opened the ECU for inspection. A persistent warning light for the O2 sensors in bank one has reappeared, despite their replacement, leading me to suspect the ECU is at fault. Is it possible to save the ECU? Will I need to repair the wiring harness?

I also terminated my contract with RAC due to the exorbitant renewal charge. They presented me with the choice of their complimentary "pay as you go" service. I can still receive a RAC callout in the event of a breakdown, albeit at an elevated fee, without a monthly subscription. Ultimately, they offered the most economical auto insurance, leading me to include my coverage with them. My insurance is due in a few weeks, and I have not experienced a breakdown thus far this year. Completely insured and no expenses incurred!

I was on a rural road, far from civilisation, on Sunday afternoon. The RAC provided an estimated time of arrival of 5 hours. I have been a member for years without utilising the service. I ultimately compensated a local recovery agency to transport me home. I value that individuals possess analogous narratives regarding alternative rehabilitation services. However, I did not renew my RAC membership.

Any breakdown company will prioritise you lower on the list if you are at home and require assistance.

In recent years, I have oscillated between the RAC and the AA. I obtain family coverage, ensuring that all four drivers and vehicles within the home are insured. Approaching either of these companies directly may not be the most economical option. Utilising platforms such as Quidco (among other cashback services) might yield a significant discount; however, there is a considerable delay before receiving the cashback.

I encountered a comparable experience. I have been a long-term RAC member; however, I did not renew my membership after the complimentary first year of KIA/RAC assistance concluded last year.

I had consistently been loyal to the RAC and frequently endorsed them, but an incident this year irrevocably altered my perspective. In May, my 12-volt battery discharged completely. I succeeded in entering the vehicle, but that was the extent of my accomplishment—I was unable to secure it. I utilised the application to solicit assistance and received a notification indicating they will contact me once a patrol was located. After some time, I was informed that someone would attend to me in around four hours. Suboptimal, although I was at home rather than stranded. This occurred at approximately 11:30. At 12:45, I received another message indicating they were exceedingly busy and would need to reschedule for the following day, which meant my car would be unlocked on a public road throughout the night. I contacted them to elucidate the issue and was informed that they will assess the matter and respond within the hour. No one made a call. Upon my subsequent contact, they acknowledged the receipt of my call but indicated that no action had been taken. In a state of despair, I resorted to Green Flag. They were unable to provide a specific time but indicated that assistance was available. At approximately 15:00, I received a message indicating that a technician will endeavour to come by 16:30. Thirty minutes later, I received a call from him indicating he would arrive in twenty minutes. He arrived punctually, and within ten minutes, my automobile was operational once more.

I possess the identical RAC policy as mentioned above, costing £23 per annum with a £40 call-out fee. They offer an additional tyre replacement coverage for £36 annually, which provides up to £150 per tyre for a maximum of five claims per year. convenient for individuals, such as me, lacking a spare tyre. I believe that £59 annually is a reasonable cost, and it has been noted that even with two £40 call-out fees in a year, it amounts to only a slight increase over the Kia pricing, with tyre coverage included as well.

Concur - Even in the improbable scenario of incurring the excess for two callouts within the year, it would still be more advantageous to forgo the Kia plan.

While there is a £40 excess, it is improbable that you will want their services.

I have possessed my EV3 for somewhat more than a year and have received correspondence from Kia Roadside Assistance—managed exclusively by the RAC—regarding the renewal of my coverage at a 'Special' rate of £10.67 per month, totalling £128 annually. A brief inquiry on MoneySuperMarket for comparable breakdown coverage yielded intriguing results. Letter of Renewal The most economical yearly like-for-like coverage commences at £7.87 per year, whereas RAC annual coverage is priced at £23.99. I choose the RAC for £23.99. If European Breakdown cover was required, it incurred an additional cost of £60. Thank you, but I decline Kia Roadside Assistance; I will obtain equivalent coverage directly from the RAC and save £104 in the process.

My 2023 Model Y exhibits the similar behaviour in Autopilot with Autosteer. A curve in the road features a vehicle positioned in the centre median, yet not within the travel lanes, occasionally for reasons I cannot discern. The absence of a straightforward "resume" also frustrates me.

It is analogous to seeing a physician and stating, "My arm experiences pain when I perform this action," to which the physician responds, "Refrain from doing that."

I consistently appreciate words of this nature. In actuality, the Speed Limit denotes the maximum permissible speed rather than the anticipated driving velocity. Speed regulation has been a concern since the implementation of ASSO around six months ago. Widely recognised problem with numerous discussions addressing it. Simply use the accelerator to increase speed.

Reduce speed; nonetheless, the vehicles are not achieving the designated speed restriction.

That indeed appears to align with the recommended approach: to proceed cautiously on corners and in congested traffic.

Identical situation with my Model S from November 2016, equipped with version 12.3.6 of Full Self-Driving. It did not occur prior to the most recent update, which was several months ago. Frustration...

My M3 Performance is exhibiting the same issue.

The Full Self-Driving (FSD) feature on my Model Y decelerates in heavy traffic or at corners and fails to regain the predetermined speed once the traffic dissipates or upon entering a higher speed limit zone. This is somewhat frustrating on the highway, as it gradually decelerates to approximately 52 mph despite being set to a maximum of 59 mph. Drivers behind me must question what is amiss with me. This is a fundamental function of adaptive cruise control that operates as expected in all other vehicles I have owned, for which I did not incur monthly fees. What is the utility of the lane-keeping feature if the vehicle consistently irritates other drivers by often decelerating? Anticipating a prompt update.

Merely a BD Original (TM) Slim. By now, you should be sufficiently acquainted with my aesthetic! It comprises content that is partially distributed among numerous MBClub discussions and posts, many of which I have contributed to, all consolidated in a single location. I recently initiated a comparable thread on tyre skip, having observed its increasing mention in recent posts, with the expectation of further discussions to follow. I proposed that instead of each individual responding to every new thread with identical information, I (and others) may respond to new threads by providing a link.