honeycut_mazda5

I own a 2023 Evolve Auto model (second from the lowest tier in Australia), and I am rather certain that all our CX-30 vehicles include automatic side mirror closure upon ignition shutdown.

Examine the thread, and you will see that Mazda has declared this sound to be “normal” and asserts that there is no issue with the gearbox.

I inquired if, if my phone fails to connect to the automobile, we should attempt using a different phone. Once a phone is authenticated, the automobile recognizes that device, and attempting to sign in with the same credentials on a different phone will be unsuccessful. What should I do if I misplace my phone? A 12-hour hold is implemented anytime an unidentified individual (except the driver and secondary driver) attempts to sign in. This is to avert a theft scenario when another individual takes control of the application. What are the implications if we fail to recognize that our vehicle has been taken for a duration of 12 hours?

This morning, I got a call from my sales representative, one day beyond the scheduled vehicle pickup date. The Telematics Control Unit (TCU) requires replacement. Pending delivery for one month. I requested the return of my deposit. Awaiting a response.

Today was the day to get a new vehicle. Prior to payment, the dealer representative attempted to register me with MyMazda and encountered Error 400C06; the same code appeared on two more phones. The dashboard did not display the "In Vehicle Network Malfunction Error." The service crew worked on it for around one hour before submitting a request to Mazda Canada. I opted not to make the payment, and my sales representative provided me with transportation home. Five hours have passed without a resolution. I acknowledge that for each individual experiencing issues with MyMazda, there are presumably several more who have no incentive to participate in this forum due to the functionality of their app.

Thank you for your response. Based on your statement, I should not be concerned about the bricking issue if I purchase the Mazda PHEV manufactured on November 23. The price of the car is excellent.

I am the owner of a 2017 Mazda6 GT and an enthusiast of the vehicle. Seeking to acquire a larger vehicle, I observed a dealer's car available for sale with only 6 kilometres on the odometer. The 2024 Mazda CX-90 PHEV Premium AWD, the highest variant, was manufactured in November 2023. The cost is USD 38,000. I am aware that individuals have encountered issues with this vehicle. Are these issues significant enough to overlook the $15,000 price difference that I will incur for any alternative three-row seating vehicle? What protections do I possess about a certified dealer used car if it becomes inoperable, as others have indicated? I intend to operate solely in hybrid or petrol mode. Any insights would be valued.

That is really foolish. It remains listed from when I setup my car at the beginning of my investigation in mid-January. I just visited Mazdausa.com, and it remains accessible. It is included in the premium protection plan for $650, with a standalone option available for $150, but availability is to be determined. If they have discontinued it, they should remove it from their website.

Are the OEM mats no longer available?

Did I interpret this correctly?

Thank you for your contribution! I want an item that is robust and long-lasting. I own a white Siberian husky mix puppy that is rather little yet has a propensity for chewing. He has gnawed through materials I believed to be impervious. The Tuxmat has a more prominent side lip in comparison to the Mazda mat. Typically, this is advantageous; but, for this little creature, I believe it will swiftly transform into a chew toy.

Where can I get these? The dealership informed me that they are not accessible via Mazda. It seems that WeatherTech does not manufacture these. Is anybody using an aftermarket product that works effectively?

Mazda undoubtedly made some unconventional decisions. The rear taillights are, in my opinion, the most offensive. Numerous owners of the PHEV PP have replaced their components with fully lighted versions, and the cost difference for the parts is minimal, leaving me perplexed as to why Mazda did not include them in the highest trim level of the PHEV. Additionally, there is an absence of CTS (PHEV PP includes MRCC), a deficiency of a centre console in the second row, and uncoordinated fender flares, among other issues.

The PHEV PP lacks this function.