Jump to content

Desiring to acquire knowledge


Recommended Posts

Greetings, individuals.

I purchased a 2016 BMW X3 M2000 diesel sport model with an automatic gearbox and an odometer reading of 18,300 miles.


The user expresses satisfaction with their recent acquisition of a new vehicle.

What is the most efficient driving configuration for achieving fuel economy on a motorway? Should one use the ECO mode, utilise cruise control, choose for an automatic or manual gearbox and maintain a speed of around 60 miles per hour?

I achieved a fuel efficiency of 42 miles per gallon on the motorway yesterday, which I found to be satisfactory. However, I am curious as to whether more improvements in fuel efficiency are possible.

Additionally, I would appreciate any valuable insights about the durability and lifespan of the automobile. The structure seems to be a well-constructed brick outhouse that offers a high level of comfort and security.

I am in need of installing running boards for my vehicle in the near future. Additionally, I am interested in exploring potential accessories that might effectively reduce noise levels for the occupant seated on the left-hand side of the vehicle.

Any suggestions, dos, or don'ts are appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fuel consumption seems to be satisfactory, but it does not exhibit exceptional efficiency. Nonetheless, it is reasonable to assume that the observed fuel consumption is within an acceptable range.

The ECO mode on my X1 seems to have no impact on fuel efficiency while significantly impairing vehicle performance, resulting in a lacklustre driving experience. It has been a considerable duration of time since I last used the ECO feature, to the extent that I am uncertain of my familiarity with its location.

It is likely that opting out of the cruise control feature will provide greater cost efficiency. However, it is important to note that the financial benefits may be negated by the expenses incurred by receiving speeding penalties. It is posited that the fuel efficiency of a vehicle might potentially be improved by using predictive measures to anticipate the presence of hills and other similar topographical features. However, it is worth noting that the resulting increase in fuel economy would likely be marginal in nature.

The X1 X Drive, specifically the 2000 cc 18D model, has shown a diverse range of performance capabilities. Notably, it has achieved an impressive fuel efficiency of around 48 miles per gallon during its operational lifespan, a factor that has elicited satisfaction on my part. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you extracting the data from the on-board computer?

If that is the case, I would raise doubts about their precision.

One practise that I adopted throughout my employment and management of business vehicles is the systematic recording of gasoline purchases, which includes documenting the miles at the time of each refuelling event, using a spreadsheet.

Despite being retired, I continue to engage in this activity and consistently see a discernible variance between the numerical output provided by the vehicle's computer system and the calculations performed on a spreadsheet. Occasionally, this has considerable importance.

Please refer to me as a person who engages in this activity, despite its potential negative connotations. It is important to note that a decrease in fuel efficiency may serve as an indication of underlying issues with the engine or braking system.

This contribution is anticipated to be beneficial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just returned from a journey between Tamworth and Plymouth. The M42, M40, and M5 are numerical designations referring to specific entities.

The ultimate statistics reveal a fuel efficiency of 51.1 miles per gallon and a speed of 53.2 miles per hour.

The field of economics is actively involved.

The cruise control was first set at a speed of 64 mph and subsequently adjusted to 57 mph after passing the Avon bridge, taking into consideration the prevailing weather conditions.

I am in agreement with the statement.

I have a query on the occurrence of a harmonious auditory stimulus, which manifests intermittently as either a single chime or a brief sequence of chimes, without any discernible premonitory indications.

Do you have any suggestions or ideas to contribute?


Thank you, individuals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am now use the on-board computer, as I have previously found them to be pretty accurate on Mercedes vehicles.


Are your conclusions accurate?  Are the reported statistics higher or lower than the actual values?


Moreover, you are not characterised as a person with a lack of social life, but rather as an individual who has a rational perspective and a curious disposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The engine in your vehicle is a 2.0L Diesel, whereas the engine in my vehicle is a 3.0L Diesel. Consequently, it is evident that there will be a discernible difference between the two.

Since the purchase of the automobile in April of the current year, the computed data pertaining to gasoline purchases is as follows:

The average miles per gallon (MPG) for a distance of 5289 miles is 34.95.

In the last several months, the recorded distances travelled were as follows: September with a distance of 36.59 miles (466 miles), October with a distance of 38.18 miles (1237 miles), and November with a distance of 33.82 miles (808 miles).

The current reading on the car's computer is 36.2.

The primary factor contributing to the notable shift in October may be attributed to a familial union taking place in Carlisle, with our place of residence being Luton.

I am uncertain about the specific methodology used by the car's computer in determining the miles per gallon (MPG), especially with regard to the temporal or mileage parameters included in the calculation. The information on this matter may perhaps be found inside the handbook; nevertheless, considering the brevity of life, it may not be worth the effort to search for it.

Please feel free to formulate your own judgement; nonetheless, it seems that the car's computations exhibit a tiny tendency towards optimism.

I appreciate your kind words. Similar to yourself, I am also retired and make an effort to maintain both physical and mental engagement.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly, it is worth noting that the term "SLOW" may also be classified as a four-letter word. Moreover, I personally experienced a lack of responsiveness and overall sluggishness when operating my X1 vehicle. I have successfully put a power pack module into the turbo system, resulting in a significant improvement in acceleration performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do individuals choose to purchase a "economical" vehicle and then invest their hard-earned currency on modifications aimed at enhancing its speed? I fail to get the rationale for not initially purchasing a larger engine that offers enhanced performance and less wear and tear, even if one intends to tune it. Additionally, opting for a larger engine would include the inclusion of larger brakes and other relevant components.

However, the world would become monotonous if everyone had identical traits. In my perspective, the crucial element becomes overshadowed. It is advisable to get pleasure from one's vehicle and the act of driving, as long as this objective is successfully attained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...