All Activity

He states that the 2022 C-class is not associated with the 3G discontinuation. I'd say MB Me service behaved a little as it very often does (in many various ways).

What is the model year? I am curious if it is associated with the discontinuation of 3G services.

I saw a considerable delay in the stated car location a few days ago.

Greetings to all I possess a 2022 C Class Estate and extensively utilise the Mercedes Me software on my iPhone. It consistently functions effectively, providing information regarding the vehicle's status, security condition, location, and more. Recently, the app has ceased functioning, albeit sporadically. For instance, it inaccurately displays the car's location, indicating a position I occupied an hour prior. It indicates that the automobile is unlocked when it is not. It does not respond to the app's request to lock the doors, open the windows, etc. It appears that a Mercedes server may be malfunctioning or operating at a significantly reduced speed. Network connection concerns may be ruled out, as the vehicle has consistently functioned well in the same locations for several years. A few hours later, as the automobile remains in the same spot, everything begins to function again. It is sporadic yet somewhat common in recent days. Is anyone else observing this behaviour, please? Is this a recognised issue that I have overlooked? I observed that an individual on Twitter (X) reported identical behaviour regarding his vehicle a few days prior. I am enquiring whether there exists a universal issue with the system. Do you have any suggestions? Kind regards

"Key not detected" while operating the vehicle? There are two keys inside the vehicle: mine and my wife's.

I have experienced numerous. However, the most exasperating situation occurs when I drop my children off and the rear seat belt alert incessantly sounds.

Did all those alarms occur when traversing the Lincoln Tunnel? Strange.

The Lincoln Tunnel in New York City produces unusual effects on my vehicle. Intermittent failure notifications manifest briefly and then vanish, never to reoccur. This indicates the presence of high-power radars or significant sources of RF interference in that vicinity. It continued to instill significant fear in me during the initial months of possession.

The most concerning issue is the warning for distracted drivers. I remained undistracted till you alerted me, Mazda. I am currently distracted by the warning notice.

In addition to the numerous weather notifications, I discovered that if an individual exits the vehicle without engaging the parking mechanism, the car would emit a warning regarding the seatbelt unless the gear is shifted to park and then back to drive. Utterly foolish.

I have the same sentiment.

I am perpetually notified that the windscreen washer fluid is insufficient, irrespective of the actual fluid level in the reservoir.

On drowsy mornings, I have received the 'time for a break' notification as I depart the driveway. 😂

I encountered several perplexing warning flags on my CX-90, but one I received recently prompted me to contemplate the rationale of the designer or software developer. The vehicle is stationed at the terminus of my driveway. I unfasten my seatbelt as I prepare to switch off the vehicle, and this warning is displayed. What nonsensical warnings have you received?

I reduced my vehicle from a fully equipped 2022 Ram 1500 Limited, since my driving frequency has diminished due to persistent medical ailments following a motor vehicle accident. I long for the truck. The rationale behind the aforementioned statement should provide you with insights into my sentiments towards the subsequent matters. The cabin noise is intolerable. Mazda installed sound-dampening glass in the front windows, but did not implement similar measures for the back windows. I am unable to converse via Bluetooth without receiving comments from others. I have never had that issue with the Ram. 2) Although the CX-70 is an SUV, I perceive a lack of room conducive to the driver (I am 6'4" and weigh 240 lbs). The test drives were satisfactory; nevertheless, prolonged usage reveals these deficiencies. The panoramic sunroof appears illogical, at least from my perspective. I enjoyed having it accessible on the Ram. The sunroof extended above the driver's head, imparting a feeling of openness and liberty. For a corporation that values the driver's experience, I am perplexed by their decision to position it so far back. The anterior edge of the glass commences directly posterior to my forehead. It will go unnoticed. Also, the manner it opens is absurd and you’ll be compelled to close it at 45-50km/h owing to the sheer noise from the wind resistance. The drive is enjoyable and exceptional. It is a large vehicle, yet remarkably agile. You will perceive every bump, sense the contours of the road, and it accelerates remarkably in sport mode. I operate in two modes. Transitioning between electric vehicles and sports, contingent upon my mood. Sport is dynamic, possesses mechanisms, and is enjoyable; nonetheless, the battery depletes rapidly. I utilise an electric vehicle in urban areas and during peak traffic hours. I installed a level 2 charger, confident in my commitment to electrification, even if I return to Ram - it is entirely worthwhile. I leased it, aware that it was a temporary vehicle. I paid off my Ram and considered purchasing a smaller car, but I was reluctant to make that commitment after driving a full-size pickup for 20 years. It is enjoyable and can be a prudent investment if you are willing to accept the imperfections. While it is not flawless, the acclaim it receives is justified due to its driving characteristics. I would characterise it as a respectable vehicle, however not as commendable as the reports suggest, save from its driving characteristics.

Here are few matters that may not be commonly discussed: The cabin lacks sufficient tranquilly. Road noise and motor noise become significantly pronounced during battery charging. In regular mode, it is quieter; however, it remains less silent than two distinct Audis I possess. The sunroof is not genuinely a sunroof. Opens only halfway and produces significant noise while driving. Fundamentally ineffectual. 2. Even with the Premium Plus trim, the daytime running lights and rear hatch lights are nonfunctional, unlike the inline-6 CX-90. The rear hatch section lights are essentially placeholders, which I have replaced with illuminated spare parts for the CX90; this was a plug-and-play task that took four hours. Additionally, the daytime running lights in the front are also placeholders. Daytime running lights are functional but lack the allure of the CX-90 inline-six. Examine cx70PPP and cx90inline6 to observe the distinction. 3.) As others have noted, dust infiltrates the door panels, albeit it may not enter the cabin. The "acceleration" from automatic deceleration in cruise control may induce whiplash and additionally consumes excess fuel by exerting full acceleration to regain cruise speed. 5.) While I value the drive modes such as 4WD, the vehicle feels excessively heavy, and the engine appears insufficient to propel it adequately. The battery appears to predominantly enhance fuel efficiency in normal mode, although I rarely exceed an average of 27 mpg. It depletes any charge as a priority before transitioning to a more balanced speed-based automatic changeover between petrol and battery. Running short distances in a coastal hamlet setting may yield significant advantages from EV mode. However, any form of highway driving will rapidly deplete the 26-mile battery range. These are my personal insights after possessing the 2025 PHEV Premium Plus for one year.

The CX-70 PHEV has undergone two recalls for software modifications. We have accumulated 10,000 kilometres on our 2025 model since January. We appreciate it; it operates well, the cabin is exceptionally quiet, and it averages 50 miles per gallon since its deployment. The sole issue is a clunking noise in the rear brakes after initiating movement from a complete stop. The seals on the back door permit the ingress of dust. Both issues have been reported, and Mazda is addressing the solutions. 47,000 appears to be an appropriate figure for depreciation. I would ensure it is meticulously inspected prior to acquisition and have the oil analysed and replaced beforehand.

I am presently seeking a new vehicle for my wife and have been considering the CX-70 PHEV for some time. Are there any concerns regarding the vehicle, such as common issues or similar matters? What is the general consensus regarding the vehicle? I admire its appearance and need additional information from current owners. Has the used market for this vehicle declined? My local Mazda dealership offers several certified pre-owned Premium Plus models with 5,000 kilometres for $47,000, which appears to be a low price. Is this accurately positioned in the valley, or does it appear strangely low? I reviewed the Carfax for one of the vehicles, and it appears it has been taken to the dealership twice for computer-related services. Is this a matter of concern?

Indeed, I perform that action, and regeneration is successfully completed; but, it appears to occur more frequently than necessary.

Direct excerpt from the E Class handbook: "Vehicles equipped with a diesel particulate filter: if the vehicle is predominantly operated over short distances, malfunctions may arise during the automatic regeneration of the diesel particulate filter." This may result in fuel accumulation in the engine oil, potentially leading to engine failure. Consequently, if you regularly drive small distances, you ought to undertake a 20-minute journey on a freeway or rural road at least every 500 kilometres. It is essential to sustain a continuous speed, avoiding stop-and-go driving in urban areas; thus, the preference for motorways or rural roads.

My ISTR would regenerate approximately every third or fourth tank full, translating to a distance of between 1,500 and 2,000 miles; but, as I sold the car 11 years ago, my memory may be inaccurate. Additionally, my everyday journey occurred on rapid A- and B-roads, which may have facilitated more frequent regenerative braking without my awareness.

It must have performed this action numerous times across 181,000 miles; otherwise, it would be completely obstructed. The sole indication that my engine is regenerating is a somewhat elevated idle speed (100 to 150 rpm) and a subtly rougher exhaust sound during vigorous acceleration. May be easily overlooked.

In 18 years and 181,000 miles, I have never observed our vehicle performing a regeneration. Original DPF, albeit temperature and pressure sensors have been updated over the years.