All Activity

Not exactly "plug and play" because you have to take off several panels inside (namely the driver's side and the entire back of the cargo area). If you get the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) digital rearview mirror, it comes with an extensive instruction booklet. I was shocked by how big it was at first, but then I remembered that it was thick because it had instructions in various languages. Only thirty-one pages are relevant, in my opinion. You can simply "plug and play" the digital rearview mirror into your OEM auto-dimming mirror. Hardware is included in the OEM digital rearview kit; if not, you will have to conduct some wire tapping. It was a breeze to connect the new digital rearview mirror to my PP as it already had the auto-dimming mirror. I hope this clarifies things for you. If you're interested in giving it a go, you can download the installation manual in.pdf format. The most challenging aspect of the installation, in my opinion, was threading the coax through the rubber tube that links the back hatch to the roof. Because there is no other point in the installation where the coax must be protected from the environment, this step is crucial. It's hard to put into words, but you'll understand it when you experience it. Just reply to this post and I'll try my best to share what worked for me if you get "stuck" on this step when installing. Hope everything works out.

It was a simple plug-and-play installation when you added the rearview mirror. Would you mind expanding a bit?

Very much so. You won't know how much you'll depend on it until you actually have it. Makes everything very obvious

In regards to the digital mirror, I couldn't agree with you more. It made more sense to add one because I was planned on doing the dash cams and I was thinking about interesting tech. After installation, it ensures that there will be no hindrance in the back passenger area or when the cargo compartment is filled to the headliner. Since my wife usually drives this car, I'm constantly impressed by how helpful the digital mirror is when I get the opportunity to take the wheel. My regular vehicle lacks that capability.

Great job on the fuel economy; 51 mpg is fantastic. Your accessory choices are spot on; the digital mirror, in particular, will revolutionise your visibility, particularly while you're in the backseat. Coordinating the installations was a wise move. It seems like a fairly equipped vehicle. Have fun with it

We filled up our brand new 2025 CX 70 PHEV PP for the first time. Before filling it up at the pump, we reduced it to nearly half full. I came up with the number of 51 mpg as our average. We are fuelling with premium. The gas mileage has been satisfactory thus far. So that we can acquire real-world data, I asked my spouse to drive this "normally," because it is her primary vehicle. We cushioned the cargo space and installed the original equipment manufacturer all-weather mats as accessories. The fit and style are perfect. I also included the Digital Rearview Mirror with HomelinkTM, another OEM device. Installing it wasn't too daunting, so I tackled it on my own. Aside from that one hard step, the installation was dead easy. I think this installation is a great idea in general, but it becomes really useful when there are three grown-ups seated in the back bench seat, since it somewhat blocks your view of the rear window. With the digital rearview mirror, you can see clearly and unimpeded. Last but not least, I decided to install the front and rear dash cams simultaneously with the digital rearview mirror installation since I was removing panels and whatnot for that purpose. Everything is going swimmingly thus far. As of right now, I will not be installing any further accessories; I am just waiting for the OEM mud guards to be delivered.

Diesel engines produce more torque, while petrol engines are slightly more thirsty. When diesel engines are warmed up and going on extended cruises, they become more efficient. Modern turbocharged petrol, on the other hand, isn't terrible for daily use and has far more torque than older NA petrol. With the exception of daily caravan pulling, the B58 torque should be more than enough for most applications. In my opinion, driving a diesel with a high mileage is not going to be easy. They are fantastic if you return them after three years of leasing. Good luck

40d= two turbochargers

On Autotrader, there's a Japanese import 335i that looks really good. I'm assuming it won't have the diesel's low-down torque and, based on what I've read, will be far thirstier. I see now that you've confirmed my suspicions; a single turbo seems like the best option. The m-performance package is my top choice, but I'll settle for one with harmon kardon, a pan roof, a good or full history, and reasonable mileage. Those third-row seats aren't for me, but they're removable and most people have them. There is a beautiful one that meets all my requirements; however, it is a 40d with 90k. I believe the harmon kardon is an absolute must-have, but I'm sure we'll have to make some sacrifices somewhere. After all, installing the kit looks like a lot less of a chore than replacing the sound system!

Yeah, I'm aware they have an x3 and an x5, and I'd be surprised if there was much of a difference in fuel efficiency between the two.

the 30thd.

Doesn't the B58 come in a petrol variant as well?

Because the higher-powered twin or triple turbo models seem to ruin bottom ends more than the lower-powered single-turbo variants, I would recommend going with the 30d. Repairs cost an absurd amount of money, yet the N57 is becoming increasingly famous for it.

Greetings, all! If it made sense, I'd stretch to a 50d, but I'm also considering the 30d (which I could remap for additional power), the 40d, and the F15 X5. Focusing on used cars with acceptable mileage and history are within my budget of £15,000 to £26,000. A couple of particular enquiries: How are the handling and performance in actual driving situations different? Is the 40d/50d's twin-turbo system significantly faster at low RPMs than a remapped 30d, for instance, in terms of throttle response and torque? Is the more complicated 40d/50d configurations less reliable than a chipped/remapped 30d in the long run, or is it the other way around? Have you noticed any typical problems? I've heard that the 40d is more refined than a tuned 30d, but I'm looking for real-world owner insights if anyone has any... In ahead, I'm really grateful.

Searching Google for the component yields an image that appears to be a 16550 cell encased. I would highly anticipate discovering that overhead in the telematics SOS device, as they go for £30–£50 on eBay. Its placement elsewhere is an oversight in the design. It appears to be located behind the glovebox in certain older Kia models. You can find out for sure by searching by VIN on partsouq. Unfortunately, my car isn't listed there just yet.

The reason the service is so expensive is because my Kia Emac's maintenance schedule indicates that the Ecall battery replacement is scheduled for the fourth annual service. 😎

As part of the recommended maintenance every four years, it is detailed on pages 9 and 9 of my handbook. Rechargeable e-call system across Europe.

The battery is hard to reach because it sits beneath the center console, but a fast online search suggests that you should change it every four years. Despite what is on today's automobiles, replacing it will not be inexpensive. When it requires replacing or there's a problem, a red light near the button looks to light up. If you don't update the battery, Kia has a statement or disclaimer that covers themselves. If the caution light is on, the mot might not pass.

I just read about a major problem with this safety feature on a Hyundai Tucson forum. You should change the battery that operates the eCall feature every three years, according to some guidebook (don't ask me which one). I haven't looked through my Owners Handbook or service manual to see if this is mentioned, and I surely am not aware of it. Apparently it impacts European (that's us!) cars, and there's a rumour that US models might be unaffected. So, let's not assume that it's just a US problem. Even worse, it has been said that when the tiny battery dies, it can cause a number of safety measures in the automobile to stop working. If the three-year battery replacement requirement is accurate, as several commenters have claimed, owners may be in a state of panic because access to the battery is complicated and requires removing the entire dashboard and center console. If this turns out to be true, it will probably impact owners of the Sportage and maybe other models as well. It was mentioned that Hyundai Bayon had the same battery replaced. There isn't much information available yet, so I'll wait for more details before making a decision. If the eCall feature is the only one that stops functioning due to a defective battery and nothing else is damaged, then it wouldn't be catastrophic. The topic in question isn't one I frequent, but it seems much livelier than the UK one, where I am a regular reader, so for the time being I'm going with the idea that someone is just trying to cause trouble. It came to my notice that 'PhilHornby,' a former contributor to these pages, has been using his scanner to check the Tucson's systems because the red warning light next to his eCall button has been intermittently lighting up. B2992:15 eCall backup battery error was the result of the scanner's investigation. In his opinion, the battery won't need changing anytime soon, he said. The subject has never been brought up on this forum, and I am simply passing this along in a "information only" capacity. Naturally, any information would be greatly appreciated.

Sure, but every single one of them had identical winter SUV tires.

Theatrical performances? In conditions where there is minimal traction on a snowy surface, it demonstrates how the all-wheel drive systems of the various vehicles differ in how they distribute power to the wheels. For someone like me who has a steep paved driveway that gets buried in snow during the winter, this is not only relevant information, but it would be crucial. In terms of tires? All of them have snow tires, and the pallisade stands out as the only one that doesn't, thanks to its subpar all-wheel drive system.

While the video's comparison of the three SUVs' performance in a "snow battle" is entertaining, it doesn't really add anything to the overall evaluation. Furthermore, a race on a level runway isn't very important. It's like those huge booming car ads that try to show people what their vehicle can do in the middle of a jungle or desert. Nice theatre, but impractical for most consumers. While a swerving test has its uses, I'd be more interested in seeing how these cars handled climbing and descending slopes, navigating snowy intersections, stopping and going in the city, driving through heavy snow, freeing an SUV stuck in the snow, and other similar situations. Their tests weren't clean, but it's wonderful to cheer for our beautiful CX-90 that we drive. Every one of the three SUVs had a distinct set of tires, as spirod noted (and brought up briefly in the video). Before the tests, the guy said that the tires on the CX-90 were "meatier" than those on the Palisade; I also noticed that he either ignored or downplayed the comments made concerning the tire difference, haha. According to certain customer reports, the Michelin CX90 tires perform better in the Winter/Snow category (which includes light snow, heavy snow, and ice traction), compared to the other set of Michelin tires. I don't understand. Again, a runway relay? It would have been more intriguing if the Palisade had the tires of the CX90 and still managed to perform significantly worse. Michelin Pilot tires on the Palisade also get a much lower treadwear rating. Vehicles appear to be registered rather than lent by dealers; I have no idea how many miles have previously been put on these tires, and the Palisade's tires have worse Winter ratings.

For a long time, Hyundai and Kia had the benefit of longer warranties. For a decade, we took care of any problems that arose. That was the major benefit. Eliminating it gave them the advantage back, but it was for naught. There have been too many drastic redesigns of the cars themselves. Consumables including oil, cabin air filters, and model-specific filters are model-and year-specific. All of them are unique, while some are cartridges and some are add-ons. Various even down to the wiper blades. From 2019 to 2021, my two Sorentos went through a wiper replacement. Because of this ongoing evolution, consumables are both scarce and costly. And then there are the modifications that prevent theft. My insurance company has threatened to cancel my coverage until I update my daughters' Seltos, and they have sent me at least four consecutive notifications about this. That causes the vehicle to be held at the dealership for one day every time. So far, my CX90 encounters have been much more consistent. Because it has been on the market for over a decade and is standard for most models, aftermarket oil filters are easy to get. For$120, I got a maintenance kit from the dealer that had new wiper blades, an oil filter with oil, and filters for the cabin and intake air. For Kia, the same parts are only available individually, necessitating visits to both the dealer and two other auto parts stores. It cost more than $300. Everyone else's Seltos was that. The age is starting to show on my 2019 Sorento. In your opinion, what will take its place? When it comes to snow handling, my criteria are whether it's possible to drive away from the curb after the ploughs have passed and how it manages to navigate streets with several snow drifts. Pretty much the same for all three. My apologies if this is completely irrelevant.

There are "issues" here, but there are also "issues" with H/K. For example, my neighbor's New Santa Fe (a copycat of the Defender) was in the shop for over 60 days.The length of time he spent in a loaner caught my eye. One of my favourite things about Mazda is how unique their designs are.Regardless of what H/K does, it always seems like they're copying someone else.

Hyundai and Kia are enormous wastes of space. Pretty on the outside and utter shit on the inside. You can always find dozens of replacement engines if you go behind one of their dealerships.