ElectricEclipse

I trust this is ok to publish. My son-in-law wants to sell his 1998 SLK Kompressor (automatic). Mileage is under 60,000; the exact amount is uncertain. The MoT expires at the end of March 2026. AMG wheels, among other components. The photographs do not depict the minor touch-ups in some corners. Could you provide recommendations for the optimal venue for selling, as well as an approximate valuation of what to request?

My present vehicle typically operates somewhat around 80 degrees, but in traffic on a sunny day, it can reach approximately 120 degrees, while during winter, it may drop below 80 degrees when driving. Numerous vehicles I own have exhibited this variety, hence it appears pretty usual to me. The majority possess a viscous coupling to operate the fan.

Temperature fluctuations may occur due to the thermostat's position (open or closed), ambient temperature, airflow through the radiator (which is influenced by speed and the operation of the radiator fan), and engine load; so, some variation is indeed typical.

You were unable to compose it; you await the arrival of songs 1 and 2, but at least you are content with your acquisitions. 👍👍

has been shared earlier by user cx90mc.

I discovered an alternative Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) on the website of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

This is the most recent Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) that includes the addition of dust covers. I am uncertain about the availability of this TSB in Canada. In September, my dealer applied lubricant to the source of the squeaky noise, and since then, the problem has not reoccurred. Anomalous noise emanating from the front of the vehicle while encountering a bump while executing a turn at a low velocity. M R TSB Number: R017/23, dated March 25, 2024, regarding PD CX-60. Until August 1st, 2023, the CX-90 is available. Until July 20th, 2023. Problem: Anomalous noise (creaking, squeaking) emanating from the front of the car after encountering a bump when making a turn at a slow speed. The reason: A stick-slip phenomena may happen between the front stopper rubber and the bracket in the front lower rear arm. Refer to TSB. The solution involves doing a thorough examination, performing tests, and making precise adjustments to ensure proper clearances. Additionally, fresh grease will be applied, and the dust covers will be replaced with new ones, even if they are not necessarily required. Modification in the process of mass production The stopper rubber has been lubricated with grease. Lower arm dust coverings have been inserted. The size of the mounting hole on the lower arm bracket has been altered.

whether you happen to be in a supermarket parking lot and see a Mk4 Sportage, you could just park close and politely ask (after observing him discreetly) whether you might test his car's luggage cover in your own vehicle.

https://go.skimresources.com/?id=130832X1600938&isjs=1&jv=15.7.1&sref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kiaownersclub.co.uk%2Fthreads%2Fdo-mk3-mk4-parcel-shelves-load-covers-fit-the-mk5.78282%2F&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.co.uk%2Fitm%2F196494308924&xs=1&xtz=-180&xuuid=0782e937168f3e271a47e1e8b11b0ac1&cci=b7360228cc984418edb3e120b8db80a0

It is unusual that a 23 Sportage would already be without the shelf. Have you inspected the area under the trunk floor to ensure that nothing has been stowed there? Upon observing the configuration of the back portion of the extendable shelf, it is evident that the Mk5 variant differs from the Mk4 version and does not seem to be compatible - however this is really a conjecture on my part. The most inexpensive Mk5 I have discovered is priced at slightly under £80, including postage and packaging, when using a discount code.

Issue with the indicator? Is it installed on a BMW? I am unable to comprehend the information. An indicator is a measure or sign that provides information about a particular condition or trend.

Thank you, KOOLCAR, for providing such an outstanding material. If the orientation of the EGR unit aligns with the specifications mentioned in the datasheet, I may be able to do a partial inspection of the vacuum portion without much disassembly.

Experiment: Reduction in miles per gallon (MPG) due to increased fan speed. Prior to my daily journey, disengage the radiator fan. Result: The MPG decrease and unusual fluctuations in MPG from the initial values were consistent (beginning at 14.1mpg and progressively increasing to 14.9 -> 16.x -> 18.x -> 21.x over the following 3 to 4 miles). Initially, the automobile achieves a fuel efficiency of 31.x MPG within a short distance after leaving home. Shortly after, it reaches the mid 30's and within 5 miles it reaches the 40's. For most journeys, it consistently achieves fuel efficiency in the 50's. I see a significant decrease in fuel efficiency when encountering even the slightest incline, which then returns to normal while going downhill. Previously, there was a noticeable decrease in fuel efficiency of around 1 or 2 miles per gallon (MPG), but today the decrease is much more significant, with a reduction of 5 or 6 MPG per hill. Last week, I conducted a comprehensive fuel efficiency test on my vehicle. Typically, I am able to travel a distance of 510 to 530 miles on a full tank of fuel, sometimes even surpassing this range. However, now, my vehicle is only able to cover a distance of 460 miles on a full tank. According to the hypothesis, the same issue that is leading to the low fuel efficiency is also causing the ECU to receive data indicating the need for more cooling.

I appreciate the advice, gentlemen. The automobile has been scheduled for a second diagnostic test this week. Today, someone speculated, "Could the increased load from the fan running impact fuel consumption?" Undoubtedly, the answer is affirmative, since it must have an impact to a certain extent. However, is a 10% influence exceeding a reasonable proposition? The primary battery has not been replaced throughout my ownership, indicating that it is likely the original battery. I replaced the battery situated in the boot on November 23rd.

The vehicle I own is a 2015 E250 CDI estate, equipped with an OM651 engine. The automobile has travelled a total of 118,000 miles without any faults, with 50,000 of those miles driven by me. Recently, my daily commute has consistently achieved a fuel efficiency of 54 miles per gallon, with a variation of just 2 miles per gallon. This is an impressive achievement for a large car. No errors or flaws, under any circumstances. Consistently performed oil and filter changes every 8,000 miles, with the most recent gearbox fluid replacement being in July of last year. Approximately three weeks ago, I saw that the radiator fan was rapidly increasing its speed approximately 30 seconds after starting the engine. Despite the low outside temperature of 2C or 3C, I must admit that I did not immediately see a decrease in fuel efficiency. The engine temperature reaches its typical 90 degrees Celsius after about 15 minutes of driving. I am also certain that on one occasion, the fan did not rotate at all throughout my 40-mile journey back home. When I switch the engine to position 2, the fan ceases to operate. Therefore, it is not the issue of being continuously active. I have perused the current discussions on the issues of a 'noisy fan' and 'radiator fan speed', as well as the solution using the AC Pressure Sensor. I am reluctant to visit that place only due to the decline in the economy. I would like to inquire if you believe that the excessive cooling from the fan is affecting the economy by preventing the engine from reaching its optimal temperature for fuel efficiency. Alternatively, it might be that the issue is with a different sensor that is more closely associated with the fuel system, and this sensor is in turn sending a signal to the Engine Control Unit (ECU) indicating a failure. What I have seen is that my fuel efficiency number when the engine is cold is now beginning at 14.1 miles per gallon. I am very meticulous when it comes to monitoring fuel efficiency. I have noticed a recent change in the vehicle's behaviour, which makes me suspect that it could be entering a state of reduced performance, often known as limp mode, but I have not seen any noticeable decrease in engine power. The scanner I now own is a Launch CRP129, which is said to be pretty simple. However, it is equipped with the latest files, and I would have expected it to be capable of detecting error codes. No fault codes are present. The only reference to any issue in the 'live stream' is found exclusively in the EGR section. The fault code "Y85 EGR cooler bypass switchover valve Fault. 53336/6058" indicates that the value of the switchover valve changes to 'OFF' while driving. Although others have brought up this point, they have not specifically addressed the problem of fan speed. I believe this is nothing. Up to this point, I have replaced the coolant temperature sensor with an authentic component from Mercedes. Unaltered. I brought the vehicle to my nearby diagnostic facility, where they had just passed the MOT despite the car having the same issue we had noted when scheduling the appointment. The diagnostic indicated a malfunctioning radiator fan controller, which is documented on the bill. I bought a Ridex fan shroud from Autodoc and installed it myself, but there was no difference - everything remained same. Considering contacting the individual again to provide them with another opportunity to identify the issue, but uncertain owing to their prior incorrect diagnosis. Opinions? Aside from the comment "god, that's a long post" 😉