All Activity

🤐

During my oil change last week, the recall work was completed in around 30 minutes. It is a software update for a computer.

Approximately one month ago, I received a letter from Carfax concerning a safety recall on my CX70 Turbo S Premium, indicating that the "vehicle may stall due to incorrect fuel level 7825I." I have not got any correspondence from Mazda concerning this matter. I ultimately overlooked it until recently when I elevated my car on ramps in my garage to perform my inaugural oil change at 3,000 miles, eight months into ownership. Upon removing the plastic cover to access the filter and drain plug, I observed that some oil had leaked over the underside. It was not motor oil. What on earth?.. I observed the dip originating from the front axle. On October 21, 2025, I brought it to my local dealer, who retained it for two days due to the unavailability of the required item. During my car's service, they reportedly addressed the recall and repaired the leaky axle seal, all covered under warranty. Interestingly, Mazda dispatched their "official" recall notice nearly two weeks subsequent to the repairs. Consequently, I believe all individuals impacted by this recall will ultimately receive the notification.

🥲

I attended my 5,000-mile service, and they informed me that they would address the recall. It is a software update pertaining to an issue with petrol containing 10% ethanol. Requires ten minutes.

I completed mine this morning; they indicated it would require two hours. However, I believe it actually takes five minutes, however they are billing Mazda for two hours of labour per vehicle. It is a straightforward software update.

I received a letter regarding the recall and to schedule an appointment. The corrosion of the electronics in the fuel pump within the tank is attributable to the ethanol in the fuel. They intend to reconfigure the computer. I fail to comprehend how reprogramming will mitigate corrosion; nevertheless, it is what it is. In my opinion, it is likely that the system will register a lower fuel level than what is actually present, prompting more frequent refuelling. I currently do not exceed a half tank to ensure safety till the recall is completed.

https://audiwindowsticker.com/

Such reminders can indeed be disconcerting, particularly when the phrasing conveys a sense of urgency. The most effective method to remain informed is to consistently verify your VIN using Mazda’s official recall database or a VIN-based service. Occasionally, the official remedy is not promptly available for all automobiles. You may request the dealer to inform you promptly when your CX-70 is registered in their system for this recall. Monitor your fuel gauge and any irregular stalling behaviour, and refrain from undertaking lengthy journeys without prearranging secure refuelling stops. If you like to verify the recall status consistently, you may commence here.

Hello everyone, I recently acquired my 2025 CX-70, and it has been excellent thus far. However, I received a recall notification via email yesterday indicating a potential stalling issue related to fuel level, with the cure now unavailable. I enquired with the dealer, and they informed me that there are currently no records in Mazda's system; nonetheless, they will monitor the situation. I feel rather apprehensive, particularly over the "stall fuel level" notification, as it suggests the possibility of becoming trapped. I have a road trip planned, and the prospect of this occurrence is troubling me. The email lacked sufficient data, and upon reviewing VIN decoders and Mazda's equipment list for my vehicle, I found no mention of this issue. I am not attempting to panic; the vehicle operates adequately and I have not had any problems thus far. However, I wish to remain proactive and be informed about potential concerns to monitor. Has anyone had a comparable recall on their CX-70 or identified a similar issue in advance? I would value your insights on how you addressed the situation and any recommendations for verifying its resolution or enquiries I should pose to the dealer upon my visit.

What a dramatic individual; consider that this is the type of person who frequently expresses themselves on Facebook neighbourhood pages.

Fortunately, it was merely her expressing distress. It may have easily been another somebody who was slain.

No matter how proficiently you drive or how cautious you are, there are sufficient individuals on the road eager to endanger you. I desire a cautionary note on the video regarding the noise produced upon her crash. Somewhat unlike, yet akin to the Honda Jazz this morning, which traversed over 400 meters across a tram-exclusive bridge, disregarding around 20 signs prohibiting vehicular access before colliding.

Observe the duration of her gaze on her phone in contrast to her attention on the road. It is located in the states, although...

Indeed, I completed all necessary tasks when I replaced the thermostat, so I believe I am adequately prepared in that regard. I observed typical oil spots around the seal positions, which had been improperly installed. It appears that the new MAF required calibration in my situation.

It is advisable to inspect all o-rings and seals on the turbo outlet (aluminium pipe) leading to the resonator (plastic box at the front of the engine) and the intercooler. I believe your 2010 model possesses the same or a very similar engine as my 2009 E280. I recently completed all my maintenance, and the performance has significantly improved; it drives much better than before. I previously underestimated its condition, but I now recognise how slow the throttle response and downshifts were. Several of these seals may have been compromised during the installation of the new intake, which is how I realised mine need replacement, as I subsequently experienced a check engine light owing to multiple leaks, including a boost leak at the intercooler pipe. I wanted to bring this to your attention, although you may already be aware. Here is a highly beneficial link that I utilised.

Disconnected the negative connection for 20 minutes while I replaced the fuel filter today. Currently, it is idling more effectively.

You may reset it by disconnecting the negative battery terminal for 10 minutes.

I apologise, everyone. I did not receive notifications regarding your responses. I ultimately resolved it. The MAF was indeed defective. I purchased a pre-owned Y-Pipe in superior condition than mine, which included one MAF. I transferred my functional MAF to it, and it accurately registered the temperature and airflow readings. Nevertheless, I occasionally have a minor hitch after startup. Avantgarde indicated at Clevedon that the adjustments must be recalibrated for optimal performance. The issue is that I currently reside in Scotland, necessitating the search for a reputable independent establishment in Edinburgh. All local garages I have contacted have provided a standard quotation of approximately £90 for one hour of service. I would be more advantageous to purchase a superior fault reader for the two minutes required to reset it.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_nkw=maf sensor&campid=5338181132&customid=2518X1570512Xf9175ef9d38da883b58403db99c3c9e4&mkcid=1&mkrid=710-53481-19255-0&subId2=15&toolid=10001

Does a new MAF sensor require coding, or is it plug-and-play?

It is uncertain if this information will be beneficial, but when my MAF sensor was offline due to a missing fuse, a prominent characteristic was difficult upshifts. If your vehicle is an automatic and you are encountering the same issue, it likely indicates a malfunctioning MAF sensor. - presuming that MB configures the transmission ECU to default to elevated line pressures in the absence of MAF sensor data, as observed in my 4L 80E.

How is it functioning?Whenever I experienced MAF failure, the vehicles operated quite poorly.

Well I've just replaced the temp sensor and I'm not surprised but it didn't fix the issue. Upon disconnecting Sensor A, I observed that its temperature remains at 79°C while Sensor B's temperature decreases to 21°C. Upon disconnecting Sensor B, both temperatures stabilise at 79°C. The subsequent course of action appears to be attempting a costly MAF replacement, unless someone possesses other insights.