
BENZE220AMG
Members-
Posts
333 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by BENZE220AMG
-
Replacement of desiccant dryer receiver
BENZE220AMG replied to BENZE220AMG's topic in General Car Chat
Following the replacement of the ring, I will also replace the dryer. I want information on the quantity of PAG oil necessary to replenish the system, since it has been leaking from the joint at the lower connection for some time. Everyone expresses a distinct opinion. -
Replacement of desiccant dryer receiver
BENZE220AMG replied to BENZE220AMG's topic in General Car Chat
What is the definition of corroded? the outside or the interior? -
Replacement of desiccant dryer receiver
BENZE220AMG replied to BENZE220AMG's topic in General Car Chat
Not the condenser, merely the drier mesh component that absorbs humidity and germs from the system; essentially a filter. The dealer part number is: A2048350147. best regards -
Greetings to everyone I need to repair the desiccant receiver dryer located to the left of the condenser. I am inquiring if anybody is aware of any tutorials or repair videos on this issue. The task should be simple; nonetheless, I like to see a little video before to execution. Best regards
-
Wheels from C43 installed on C220 4MATIC
BENZE220AMG replied to BENZE220AMG's topic in General Car Chat
My primary confusion is to the 4MATIC system, rather than the potential protrusion of the rims from the fender. -
Wheels from C43 installed on C220 4MATIC
BENZE220AMG replied to BENZE220AMG's topic in General Car Chat
That is not the question I posed. -
Wheels from C43 installed on C220 4MATIC
BENZE220AMG replied to BENZE220AMG's topic in General Car Chat
I am uncertain if I will have any issues installing the new wheels with an ET33 offset. Will it adversely impact the 4MATIC, posing any hazards to it? Will it also impact the driving in any manner? I appreciate your assistance in advance. -
Wheels from C43 installed on C220 4MATIC
BENZE220AMG replied to BENZE220AMG's topic in General Car Chat
-
Greetings, I now own a 2018 W205 C220d 4MATIC. Purchased second-hand wheels from C43/450, which had the following dimensions: Front - 7.5Jx18 ET33 Rear - 8.5Jx18 ET49 The rears are OK, provided they fall within the manufacturer's specified range. I am perplexed by the fronts. The manufacturer specifies that the permissible offset range is between 42 and 46, however mine measures 33.
-
I find myself in the same possition
-
W204 Comand Satellite Navigation Update
BENZE220AMG replied to vitessear3's topic in General Car Chat
If your vehicle is the facelift W204, it will be equipped with COMAND Online NTG4.5. The pre-facelift model included NTG4, which had a big PCMCIA slot and a pop-up display. The most recent maps data is version 20.0. The map data may be downloaded at no cost from MB, thereafter transferred to a USB drive, and uploaded to the COMAND unit in the vehicle via the USB connector located inside the center armrest. However, it is a 50GB download, necessitating a robust Internet connection. You will thereafter be required to enter a PIN number, which is specific to your VIN; this PIN code may be acquired via MB dealers or other internet vendors. You may also get a copy of the maps data on a USB drive from them, should you choose not to download it for free at home. -
Components of the pattern will, naturally, be less expensive. Occasionally, it is advisable to incur additional costs when the component number is uncertain. I have used MB Newcastle and Edinburgh DIY components and have found them to be quite competitive.
-
Purchasing from Mercedes poses no difficulties. Components are often extremely cheap, and one cannot ascertain this unless an inquiry is made. 👍
-
Contact the parts department of your local Mercedes-Benz dealer using the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN). At the very least, you can be certain that they will provide the appropriate component. 👍
-
Purchased a coffee machine as a gift due to Mrs. Me's envy. However, the box was damaged and marked with permanent ink, rendering it unsuitable for presentation. The vendor faltered, and eBay issued a refund. No one has requested the £280 machine. Mrs. Me is indebted to me for a treat.
-
I examined it and was unable to comprehend how. However, when matters get convoluted, maybe because to my lack of proficiency with eBay, I tend to lose patience and revert to familiar tasks. Life is too brief if I cannot see a means of transcendence.
-
I see a fraudulent scheme by the purchaser. Insufficient time to unbox and evaluate. However, it explicitly states that I will not be receiving it back. It states that they have issued a reimbursement on my behalf, at no expense to me. I have initiated several returns over the years, and eBay remains uninvolved until the vendor fails to provide a refund. This is too rapid. Perhaps further clarity will emerge thereafter.
-
https://www.ebay.co.uk/?mkevt=1&mkcid=1&mkrid=710-53481-19255-0&campid=5338181132&toolid=10001&customid=2518X1570512X1a247a4460885e671adabcaacbaa4401
-
Ebay no longer imposes fees on sellers for listing advertisements; instead, they levy a nominal charge on buyers for protection services. The customer chooses their preferred courier; nonetheless, the seller remains accountable if issues arise, as has occurred with Evri in my previous experiences. A few days ago, I sent an electronic item. The buyer selected the most economical shipping option. It came today between 2:30 and 4:30. At 5:15, eBay informed me that they had resolved a return request for it. Since standard delivery was selected, I will not incur charges for the return, and I will not be getting the goods back. If I comprehend this accurately, the buyer now has the thing without charge, and eBay does not anticipate that I will make a payment, since the funds are presently accessible. It cannot be, or eBay has suddenly become a charity.
-
That is essentially my argument, however. The original poster has clearly stated their usage: 12-mile local trips and a 140-mile round journey monthly. It would be akin to stating that every four years one must retrieve a wardrobe from Ikea, hence necessitating the continual use of a huge estate vehicle or similar. In other words, if the original poster appreciates the EQA, a 35-minute charging duration at a potential fast charging station should not deter a purchase, in my humble opinion.
-
While it is reasonable, it is important to note that the MB specifications indicate that a 10-80% charge takes 35 minutes when using public quick charging; in my view, this is not a significant drawback, since most people will seldom depend on this option.
-
The original poster is considering a vehicle for 12-mile local excursions and, once monthly, a voyage of 140 miles. In my opinion, it is unnecessary to consider charging speeds as a criterion for the purchase in certain situations. In my opinion, EQA seems to be the most rational option for this kind of application.
-
In my experience, a surface charge, such as a brief excursion to Wayne Gates and back, seems to dissipate rapidly. I recommend completely charging the battery before assessing the voltage decline over time.