diablos_carcv5

If all they did was regas it, then surely they didn't undertake any unauthorized work.After most AC maintenance, I anticipate the system will need a regas. If that's all they did, the final tab couldn't have been that high, could it? I'm certain that if you go back and calmly make your case, you'll be able to resolve the situation with little hassle. Deleted because a speedier typist beat me to it!

For that last-minute shine, autosol is a lifesaver.

Have you thought about filing for divorce?😀

Yes they should be (and probably are ) aware of the Timing Chain Stretch issue. However as said earlier, it was never deemed to be a recall as such. Therefore notification of the requirement was never posted out to owners. It was a "Campaign" during which the timing chain was checked for stretch and a software modification was flashed to the ECU which activated the engine management light (EML) should the chain stretch beyond acceptable limits. It was a world wide event and every vehicle was supposedly checked the next time it was in a Mazda dealership. Are you the first and only owner or was the car second hand ? Maybe the previous owner (if there was one ) never took it to a Mazda dealership. Three things to consider here. Did your car ever go into a Mazda dealership for servicing at any time from about 2009 onwards ? I'm afraid I'm unable to give an exact date If the answer is yes, then it should have been checked and a record made of this fact If the above was actually done then Mazda UK should have a record of this which is linked to your VIN number I don't know where this assists you in your quest for recompense, but the dealership are most certainly trying to avoid telling you the truth.

Even though these are extensive, they may be useful to you. Please observe the dates of these posts and keep in mind that your vehicle was already three or four years old when this occurred. If Mazda is able to assist you with a goodwill gesture. I do not believe they will offer more than 25%. As stated previously, my first step would be to visit Mazda. Possibly, the expression "recall" is deceptive. In fact, it was referred to as a "campaign" to examine chain strain. Mazda never really acknowledged that a "recall" was necessary. Consequently, it is not noted on the VOSA recall website. Logge

You've demonstrated a classic instance of Timing Chain Stretch. Your Mazda dealer should be able to tell you if your vehicle has been inspected in accordance with the Timing Claim Recall, despite the fact that your vehicle is no longer under warranty. My first step would be to investigate further. If the answer is no, I would ask Mazda why and what can be done to remedy the situation. If so, the answer is significantly more costly. Due to the fact that you have received three estimates from three distinct individuals, the cost is likely to exceed £1000. Sorry

The very low mileage may be the reason the engine has to be de-coked. Only 2000 miles a year, or roughly 32 miles per week throughout a year, have been driven on average by the vehicle. When operated in this manner, the engine has never had a chance to fully warm up and burn off all the contaminants that contribute to the buildup of carbon. It is possible that it was only ever used as a shopping vehicle for extremely short trips. Engines must be used often to stay in top condition. The engines of automobiles that spend the most of their life on highways shouldn't ever need de-coking, in my opinion.

I had a car (not a Mini) that did this, and it was caused by the handbrake binding on one side and irregular tyre pressure. Worth a glance?

The venture version wasn't limited, but the Takuya seems to have been. However, based on how many are still on the road, there are just over 900 diesel ventures and 2.2k gas ventures ever recorded, making it a lot rarer than the Takuya. For comparison, there are currently 42,000 "limited editions" of the gas Corsa that have been registered. Nice car, and I like the colour red.

While my vehicle was being serviced at the dealership, I got to sit in a fully-optioned Gen 4. It was beautiful inside and out, especially for the class. Not that I've wanted to, but I haven't driven one either. While the second vehicle you have is attractive, I don't believe I could handle the stress of installing and removing a rear-facing car seat from it due to the awkward design of the roof and doors.

I thought it was usual practise for self-dimming to turn off when the mode was switched to reverse. When the rear window is still heavily tinted, it doesn't assist much. Over-the-shoulder looks are almost useless in low light due to the vehicle's tinted back windows and rising belt line. I've found that utilising mirrors and staring is sufficient for reversing in my Mazda 3, but that it all relies on the camera angle. The C3's door mirrors and camera are my go-to for rearward visibility since the mirror cuts off at shoulder level and at night, but the camera provides almost 180 degrees of vision all the way to the ground.

The Gen 4 is a wonderful looking vehicle with a lovely cabin for the money. When the first one was out, I sat in one at the dealer and it made my vehicle seem like it was from the 1980s. However, it seems to have been constructed with all the bells and whistles in mind. Because you had windows in the Gen 2, you don't need a back camera or a blind spot monitor, but as wonderful as the Gen 4 is, it was obviously created with visibility at the bottom of the priority list. While it's comforting to imagine that a good driver doesn't require these items, many current automobiles make being a decent driver difficult without blind spot monitoring and other features. Even on the C3, which is not as low-roofed as the Mazda 3 but does have kicked-up rear windows, a sloping roof, hefty C pillars, a tiny back window, and dark tinted rear glass, a reversing camera is a much better alternative than looking out. Yes, you still look over your shoulder, but your range of vision is almost nonexistent.

Those were the days... Citroen has one, and if you drive on tight rural roads on a frequent basis, it may be dangerous. Turned off on the way back from the dealer, and sometimes turns on on lengthy highway journeys if I remember. To be honest, 98% of the current driver aid technology is just distracting, yet it is essential for NCAP. The only item that is helpful is the device that scans road signs and sends the speed restriction to the cruise or speed limiter. I think I like the older vehicles because, as long as you don't drive like a jerk, it lets you get on with it and only intervenes if things go really wrong. They also looked to throw less wobblers.